Episode 14 Part 1: How to Deal with Fog Machines in Clubs

Myles talks about taking nightclub photos in clubs that use fog machines. Fog machines often ruin photos, but there are ways to work around and with the fog produced. (Part 1 of 2)

136 Responses to “Episode 14 Part 1: How to Deal with Fog Machines in Clubs”

1. Pyrotech56 says:

   October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

   [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
2. Pyrotech56 says:

   October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

   [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
3. Pyrotech56 says:

   October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

   [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
4. Pyrotech56 says:

   October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

   [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
5. Pyrotech56 says:

   October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

   [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
6. Pyrotech56 says:

   October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

   [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
7. Pyrotech56 says:

   October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

   [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
8. Pyrotech56 says:

   October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

   [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
9. Pyrotech56 says:

   October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

   [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
10. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
11. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
12. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
13. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
14. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
15. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
16. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
17. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
18. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
19. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
20. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
21. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
22. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
23. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
24. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
25. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
26. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
27. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
28. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
29. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
30. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
31. Pyrotech56 says:

    October 22, 2011 at 4:43 pm

    [..YouTube..] If the billowing fog is behind the people, it produces a very neat effect–I have a lot of pix where it looks like the people are surrounded by clouds behind them. If it is between you and the subject, it washes out the photo as you say.
32. funincluded says:

    January 19, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @SuperRadDanny
    hahaha, that’s hilarious
33. funincluded says:

    January 19, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @SuperRadDanny
    hahaha, that’s hilarious
34. funincluded says:

    January 19, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @SuperRadDanny
    hahaha, that’s hilarious
35. funincluded says:

    January 19, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    [..YouTube..] @SuperRadDanny
    hahaha, that’s hilarious
36. Simenson Photography says:

    August 4, 2012 at 6:06 pm

    You mentioned the fog examples that you could not find from Chicago. I am a photographer in Chicago for many Clubs because i work full time for a promo company called Surreal Entertainment. I can Bet the Club was The Mid. but i could be wrong. Maybe Spybar or VLive. but anyways. I enjoy your videos lots of great help.